Peace At Colombia, quote: Really?

Quoting journalist Fernando del Rincon, cnn chain in Spanish in its conclusions program, whose section is called, really?

The president of Colombia expressed during the UN summit would return with his speech of peace, but clearly there will be "peace" in Colombia for 2016, and that is the crux of the matter, beyond politicize a constitutional right as peace in one peace process, with one of the actors of widespread conflict and serious, systematic as has happened in the country the last 100 years, not 50 or 40 as many argue, why?

1- exacerbated with the onset of small and big wars during the first decade of the twentieth century, through a religious war as the battle of the supreme, Thousand Days' War that originates in the previous century to the twentieth, to failures of revolutionary ideals whose Marxist origin and influence of countries in the region during the 50s and 60s, failure in Colombia as an ideal, which left two consequences: an idealistic political party disappeared with the advent of two parties that the power they took turns to legitimize its influence on the "primary constituent"

Really?

So much so that the conflict is not caused by a peasant revolution that he sensed a quest to eradicate inequality in some way, initially the armed uprising, no, the widespread social conflict and systematized as I have called this forum, has an origin ancient promoted by demagogues, politicized circumstances of social inequality, poverty, lawlessness, and inequality, and exacerbated by the drug trade in the 60 and 70 as a means for war.

Really?

Medium, which swarmed more "actors" of the conflict and the ELN (National Liberation Army, EPL, M19, PARAMILITARISM, CRIMINAL GANGS, among others, and that means not only as means to an end, but a means of financing and promotion of violence despite the ideological arguments of each armed group to hold its armed raised and always against the named primary constituent, the most serious belonging to that constituent not only as dogma and doctrine understood as "people" but some included in the constituent national assembly that gave rise to the Colombian constitution in 1991, that of aspiracionista character that project a more egalitarian, inclusive, with human dignity, based on a social status of guarantor rights law as peace country, individual freedoms and social among the many related and independent as its primary source.

Now where are the actors in the conflict? It will be only the FARC are responsible for the anti peace ?, it is that ending the conflict with the FARC will be peace, where is the ELN included, or the new "bacrim" and most distressing to talk peace as right where they are Colombians.

Really?

In Colombia, the indices of inequality are among the highest in the world, according to DANE unemployment whose figures predate the first world, they see that the country has a low unemployment reaching a digit, 2014, this seems existentially. since the reality varies as to the conditions of those jobs, underemployment, and lack of opportunities to better quality of life. Education according to renowned PISA, which examines the performance of education Dejan the country among the last places, but despite this and innumerable social problems, corruption, extreme poverty, common crime to politics, carousel contracts, bleeding of health etc, spoken in international forums evolution and strengthening the middle class Colombian who allows a country to strengthen its financial institutions among others, existentially and figures the country improved, in reality we see banks lowering their rates interest, so that the average Colombian accessing a credit or several credits to purchase goods and services, unpayable credits eternal, and unreal because now every Colombian has car and home loans to 10 15 to 20 years being a generational slave economic system, but without tangible opportunities for quality of life, in short; They work to pay loans, not to pay and quality of life. Concomitant to all the facts described above, we have to ask and violence? and common crime that seems to be the only libretto news in Colombia, crimes such as theft, homicide, sexual intercourse, abusive sexual acts, conspiracy, trafficking and possession of narcotics, and many more, have had a sustained increase in recent years in cities like Bogota where go out at 9 pm is not knowing whether to return home or end up in legal medicine

all this I have briefly described each item clearly has a plot and structural context of each ministry and government in general, but we have to ask this again generates a true picture of peace?

Really?

therefore in Colombia can not speak of peace, much less as a constitutional right, peace is built with the generation of quality equal life, with the promotion of a society aware of the other, which has the otherness as an end, beyond the exhaustive equal legal codes, peace is inclusive, that belongs to everyone, not only depends on a specific armed group, peace belongs to citizens not to an armed actor, peace is not only done it with acts legislative and peace agreements that conform to international humanitarian law, with the surrender of weapons by a group, peace is construction and SERIOUSLY is right to do it with the other, that the conflcito is completed with the FARC and projected on the table a restorative justice is fine but can not speak of post-conflict when peace is not an enforceable right for all Colombians, seriously.

Finally I quote:

"Or we walk together towards peace, or never find it.
"Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790) Statesman and Scientific American.

"There is an extremely subtle and dangerous temptation to confuse peace with the mere absence of war, be tempted to confuse health with the absence of disease or freedom to not be imprisoned. The terminology is sometimes misleading. For example the term "peaceful coexistence" means no war and no true peace. "
"Dominique Pire (1910-1969) Belgian priest and sociologist